Why are schools so expensive? The state is not paying students enough

New York state has long been a national leader in school funding.

But the state has struggled to keep up with rising costs and its education system has been plagued by budget shortfalls.

This year, the state is expecting to pay $4.4 billion more in school aid than last year, according to the state’s budget office.

The state will spend $2.2 billion more than the $2 billion it had projected for the current fiscal year, and $3.6 billion more for next year, state data shows.

New York is not alone in this.

Several other states have reported similar financial problems.

A new study by the American Association of University Professors found that public schools in the United States pay about two-thirds of the national average for tuition, fees and room and board.

The average New Yorker spends more than $15,000 on school supplies, such as books and school supplies for kids from day care centers, according the American Journal of Public Health.

More than half of the students who attend New York City public schools are eligible for free or reduced-price lunches.

At the same time, the average New York public school teacher makes $75,000 a year.

State budget director Jennifer Noland says New York’s problems have been largely driven by an oversupply of teachers.

Noland, who is the executive director of the New York Association of Charter Schools, said the state should not be relying on school districts to make up the shortfall by cutting jobs.

“We’ve got to make the cuts, and that means we’re going to have to make cuts in other things,” Noland said.

“We’ve done it for 20 years, and it’s never been good enough.

So the reality is we’re not doing it.

We have to do it.”

New York schools are among the nation’s most expensive.

New Orleans, for example, is ranked the most expensive school district in the country by U.S. News and World Report, with a cost of $5.7 billion.

Other cities, such a San Francisco and Chicago, have higher costs, but they are not in the top five.

New Jersey’s school district is ranked No. 6, followed by Florida, Florida and New York.

New Hampshire has a cost that is about $5,400 a year, while Vermont has a $5 million annual cost.

The median annual cost in New York was $532 a year for students in grades K through 12, according a study from the New Jersey Council of Public Schools.

A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, published online March 1, says that a combination of new school funding and a federal tax on wealthy families, will push the cost of education to a level that will eventually have to be paid for by state and federal taxes.

The researchers looked at a range of studies to determine the economic impacts of new federal education funding and the effects of those changes on public school systems across the country.

They found that spending on public schools would decrease by nearly $1.3 trillion over 10 years.

The federal tax could increase the cost to $6.2 trillion, the researchers found, which is more than four times the cost for the next largest increases.

The study also found that new federal spending would drive up the cost in four states: Connecticut, New Jersey, New York and Vermont.

The federal budget office has said it will release more detailed financial data on the state and school systems next month.

But there are signs that the state may be in a more difficult spot financially.

In June, state budget director Kristin Ziebarth said the current financial problems are not only a consequence of state spending, but also of state and local governments’ inadequate financial resources.

The state’s $4 billion in state aid is not enough, ZieBarth said in a letter to the governor and the Legislature.

“New York City is the largest state school system in the nation, with more than 6,500 schools,” she wrote.

“If New York were a city, the financial burden would be on the taxpayers, not the schools.

In other words, if the financial burdens were borne by New York taxpayers, the New Yorker would be able to make ends meet.

But, as we know, New Yorkers can’t pay for schools because the state does not have the resources to pay for them.”

The state is now considering how to raise taxes to pay down its debt, but ZieBart said in her letter that she believes New York could still be able meet its needs.

ZieBarst said in the letter that “there is no doubt that New York will have to spend money to support our schools and our students.”

“The burden is not going to be borne by the taxpayers; it is going to fall upon the state,” she said.

“I don’t believe that the State of New York has the resources available to us to make